A settlement being discussed in an antitrust lawsuit against the NCAA and major college conferences could cost billions and pave the way for a compensation model for college athletes.
An agreement has not been finalized and many questions remain unanswered. It is also unclear if new rules could withstand further legal scrutiny, but it appears college sports is heading down a revolutionary path with at least some schools directly paying athletes to participate. Here’s what is known and what still needs to be figured out:
House vs. NCAA is a class-action federal lawsuit seeking damages for athletes who were denied the opportunity to earn money from use of their name, image or likeness going back to 2016. The plaintiffs, including former Arizona State swimmer Grant House, are also asking the court to rule that NIL compensation should include billions of dollars in media rights fees that go to the NCAA and the wealthiest conferences (Big Ten, Big 12, Atlantic Coast and Southeastern), mostly for football and basketball.
Related articles:
Related suggestion:
A new declaration in Mexico gives 19 cats roaming the presidential palace food and care furDairy cattle in Texas, Kansas test positive for bird fluLego head mugshots add to California's debate on policing and privacyA new declaration in Mexico gives 19 cats roaming the presidential palace food and care furPunxsutawney Phil and wife Phyllis are parents of 2 babiesLawsuit seeks to force ban on menthol cigarettes after delays by BidenWhat we know about Kate Middleton's cancer diagnosisNever mind the overcapacity, have some dim sum! — Radio Free AsiaNo, OJ Simpson did not admit on X to the 1994 killings of his exJ&J to pump another $13B into its MedTech business with Shockwave deal
0.1341s , 6502.921875 kb
Copyright © 2024 Powered by Paying college athletes appears closer than ever. How could it work and what stands in the way? ,Global Gleam news portal